From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: problem with (incorrectly?) INVALID packets
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:48:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45837AA1.6030508@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612151134.35827.mike@v6.gaima.co.uk>
On 12/15/06 05:34, Mike Williams wrote:
<really big snip>
> Routing table now:
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 90.1...1.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.131.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond1
> 192.168.22.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond3
> 192.168.0.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.30.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.136.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond2
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 90.1...1.69 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
>
> Routing table previously:
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 90.1...1.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.131.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond1
> 192.168.22.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond3
> 192.168.0.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.30.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.136.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond2
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 90.1...1.69 0.0.0.0 UG 1000 0 0 br0
Sorry, if I have missed it, but which system are these routing tables
from? Bridge or LFW?
> # uname -r
> 2.6.17-hardened-r1
> # zgrep BRIDGE_NETFILTER /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y
This means that you will be able to use IPTables to filter your bridged
traffic. Which as I think about it, with out seeing your full IPTables
rule set, may be the reason some of your packets are having their state
incorrectly identified. Can we see a full iptables-save output?
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-16 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 19:42 problem with (incorrectly?) INVALID packets Mike Williams
2006-12-13 3:11 ` Grant Taylor
2006-12-13 12:39 ` Mike Williams
2006-12-13 23:27 ` Grant Taylor
2006-12-15 11:34 ` Mike Williams
2006-12-16 4:48 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2006-12-15 9:15 ` Mike Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45837AA1.6030508@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.