From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xt_request_find_match
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4587D227.1000003@trash.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612161851180.30896@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612161851180.30896@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Reusing code is a good idea, and I would like to do so from my 
> match modules. netfilter already provides a xt_request_find_target() but 
> an xt_request_find_match() does not yet exist. This patch adds it.

Why does your match module needs to lookup other matches?