All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
	David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@mvista.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:32:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <458AEF79.5030600@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612211457390.18171@xanadu.home>

Guys:

>>Probably? What I am wondering is this: can the compiler
>>optimize away the range check that is duplicated in GPSR/GPCR
>>and  GPIO_bit for __gpio_set/get_value? Or could we optimize
>>this case by expanding the macros in place (which would mean
>>duplicating code from pxa-regs.h)...
>>    
>>

Who cares?  :)

I don't think there's much point in optimizing here, since these 
functions won't be hot paths anyway.  Yes, they'll be called in 
interrupt handlers and so we don't want them to be _too_ heavy, but 
compared to the overhead of an interrupt handler, a few extra 
instructions in the GPIO access will get lost in the noise.

Inlines generally seem to be more maintainable, give you a symbol that 
you can disassemble and breakpoint, etc.  I'll take them over the macro 
implementations any day, in this case even if there's a cost of a few 
instructions.

All IMHO, of course.


b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-21 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-11 23:41 [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls David Brownell
2006-11-12  1:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-12  3:04   ` David Brownell
2006-11-12  3:15     ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-13  3:30 ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 17:38 ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-13 17:56   ` Thiago Galesi
2006-11-13 19:25     ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 19:50       ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 18:19   ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 18:38     ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-13 19:29       ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 20:15         ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-20 21:49           ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  3:44             ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-21  4:45               ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  5:09                 ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-21  5:35                   ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  6:09                     ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-21 18:13                       ` David Brownell
2006-11-22  3:36                         ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-22  3:55                           ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-22  4:45                           ` [Bulk] " David Brownell
2006-11-22  4:47                             ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-21 15:57                     ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-23  0:40                       ` David Brownell
2006-11-30  6:57                         ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-11-30  7:29                           ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-11-30 22:24                           ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 22:15           ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  2:56             ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 20:00       ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 21:30         ` Paul Mundt
2006-11-14  3:21           ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 19:21   ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 19:43     ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 20:15       ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 20:26         ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 20:53           ` David Brownell
2006-11-13 20:58             ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-13 20:29         ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-16 14:54 ` [RFC/PATCH] arch-neutral GPIO calls: AVR32 implementation Haavard Skinnemoen
2006-11-20 21:47   ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  3:11     ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-21  5:06       ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  5:51         ` Bill Gatliff
2006-11-21 18:19           ` David Brownell
2006-11-21  9:11     ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2006-11-21 19:03       ` David Brownell
2006-11-28 12:36         ` [RFC/PATCH] arch-neutral GPIO calls: AVR32 implementation [take 2] Haavard Skinnemoen
2006-11-30 19:05           ` David Brownell
2006-12-01  9:51             ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2006-12-20 21:04 ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 0/6] arch-neutral GPIO calls David Brownell
2006-12-20 21:08   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 1/6] GPIO core David Brownell
2006-12-27 17:49     ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-28 22:05       ` David Brownell
2006-12-29  0:27         ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-30  1:18           ` David Brownell
2007-01-01 20:55             ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-01 21:27               ` David Brownell
2007-01-02 14:18                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-20 21:09   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 2/6] OMAP GPIO wrappers David Brownell
2006-12-20 21:11   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 " David Brownell
2006-12-21  6:10     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-21  6:45       ` David Brownell
2006-12-20 21:12   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA " David Brownell
2006-12-21  6:12     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-21  6:44       ` David Brownell
2006-12-21 14:27         ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-21 15:03           ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-21 17:25             ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-21 19:32               ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-21 20:10                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-21 20:32                   ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2006-12-22  6:53                   ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-28 20:47                     ` David Brownell
2006-12-30  2:15                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-30  2:38                         ` David Brownell
2007-01-01 19:43                         ` David Brownell
2006-12-30  1:13                     ` David Brownell
2006-12-21 19:25             ` David Brownell
2006-12-27 17:53     ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-28 20:48       ` David Brownell
2006-12-28 20:50         ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-28 20:53           ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-20 21:13   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 5/6] SA1100 " David Brownell
2006-12-21  6:13     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-22  7:16       ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-22 15:05         ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-30  2:21         ` David Brownell
2006-12-30  3:15           ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-12-30  6:01             ` David Brownell
2006-12-30 13:59               ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-30 15:08                 ` Russell King
2006-12-23 11:37     ` Russell King
2006-12-23 20:39       ` David Brownell
2006-12-27 18:24     ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-20 21:14   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 6/6] S3C2410 " David Brownell
2006-12-21 10:33     ` Arnaud Patard
2006-12-21 15:29       ` pHilipp Zabel
2006-12-23 11:40       ` Russell King
2006-12-20 23:30   ` [patch 2.6.20-rc1 0/6] arch-neutral GPIO calls Håvard Skinnemoen
2006-12-20 23:46     ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=458AEF79.5030600@billgatliff.com \
    --to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrew@sanpeople.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
    --cc=khilman@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.