Re: [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!)

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>> On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set.  The MAC-VLANs are in 
>>> active use.
>>>  From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem, 
>>> however.
>>>
>>> Any ideas about what this could be?  It seems to be reproducible every 
>>> day or
> ...
>> If it doesn't help, I hope lockdep will be more
>> precise when you'll upgrade to 2.6.19 or higher.
> 
> ... or when you enable lockdep in 2.6.18 (I've
> forgotten it's there alredy!).

I got lucky..the system was available by ssh still.  I see this in the boot logs..I assume
this means lockdep is enabled?  Should I have expected to see a lockdep trace in the case of
his soft-lockup then?

.....
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo MolnarDec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... 
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES:    8
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH:          30
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS:        2048
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... CLASSHASH_SIZE:           1024
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES:     8192
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS:      8192
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... CHAINHASH_SIZE:          4096
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel:  memory used by lock dependency info: 696 kB
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel:  per task-struct memory footprint: 1200 bytes
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ------------------------
Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: | Locking API testsuite:
....


> 
> Jarek P.


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com