From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GyVLq-0006TW-J0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GyVLo-0006RS-Tp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GyVLo-0006RJ-Qs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:24 -0500 Received: from [194.25.134.80] (helo=mailout01.sul.t-online.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GyVLo-0005sa-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:24 -0500 Message-ID: <458E9DBF.7000002@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:33:19 +0100 From: Werner Dittmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] time for 0.8.3/0.9? References: <41e41e7a0612240450o32d160d3na9b9e27a034436e5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <41e41e7a0612240450o32d160d3na9b9e27a034436e5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Well, I'm not a Qemu developer and have no right to vote or make suggestions here. Thus I can only express my humble opinion here (a somewhat selfisch opinion though:-) ): I would love to see that a new release would solve the problems with 64bit (x86-64) emulation. In particular if Qemu was compiled on a x86_64 system with a native 64bit compiler. To me it seems that there are some problems. Regards, Werner Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Hi, > > The last release of QEMU was 0.8.2 from 6 months ago, > Since then, quite a lot of features has been added to CVS and lots of > things were fixed.. > > So I was wondering, isn't it time to start prepare for a new release? > (I think it should be called 0.9.0, fabrice will probably disagree :) > ). > > Thanks, > Hetz