Re: Kernel 2.6.17.13: eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

Re: Kernel 2.6.17.13: eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

[Robert Hancock]

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> I am using a dual port Intel NIC on an A-Bit IC7-G; any reason why I get 
> these?
> 
> [4298634.444000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
> [4299146.645000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

...

> I am using the e100 driver, MAC addr commented out with **.
> 
> [4294675.208000] eth2: 0000:04:04.0, 00:**:**:**:**:**, IRQ 18.
> [4294675.209000]   Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around.
> [4294675.209000]   Board assembly 711269-003, Physical connectors present: 
> RJ45

I don't think you are using e100, these messages seem to be from 
eepro100, not e100. Try disabling eepro100 and see if e100 works.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

Re: Kernel 2.6.17.13: eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

[Justin Piszcz]

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Robert Hancock wrote:

> Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > I am using a dual port Intel NIC on an A-Bit IC7-G; any reason why I get
> > these?
> > 
> > [4298634.444000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
> > [4299146.645000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
> 
> ...
> 
> > I am using the e100 driver, MAC addr commented out with **.
> > 
> > [4294675.208000] eth2: 0000:04:04.0, 00:**:**:**:**:**, IRQ 18.
> > [4294675.209000]   Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around.
> > [4294675.209000]   Board assembly 711269-003, Physical connectors present:
> > RJ45
> 
> I don't think you are using e100, these messages seem to be from eepro100, not
> e100. Try disabling eepro100 and see if e100 works.
> 
> -- 
> Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
> To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
> Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
> 

Oops-- thanks, e100 has not produced the error yet.

Justin.

Kernel 2.6.17.13: eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

[Justin Piszcz]

I am using a dual port Intel NIC on an A-Bit IC7-G; any reason why I get 
these?

[4298634.444000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299146.645000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299146.645000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299147.437000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299147.454000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299149.442000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299155.247000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299159.271000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
[4299165.291000] eth2: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.

I see in the mailing list archives this error was most prevalent in 2.4.

However, it also shows up in 2.6:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/6/7/49
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/19/20
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0506.0/1512.html
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0405.2/0535.html

I am using the e100 driver, MAC addr commented out with **.

[4294675.208000] eth2: 0000:04:04.0, 00:**:**:**:**:**, IRQ 18.
[4294675.209000]   Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around.
[4294675.209000]   Board assembly 711269-003, Physical connectors present: 
RJ45
[4294675.209000]   Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
[4294675.209000]   General self-test: passed.
[4294675.209000]   Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
[4294675.209000]   Internal registers self-test: passed.
[4294675.209000]   ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x24c9f043).
[4294675.211000]   Receiver lock-up workaround activated.
[4294675.211000] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:05.0[A] -> GSI 23 (level, 
low) -> IRQ 17
[4294675.221000] eth3: 0000:04:05.0, 00:**:**:**:**:**, IRQ 17.
[4294675.222000]   Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around.
[4294675.222000]   Board assembly 711269-003, Physical connectors present: 
RJ45
[4294675.222000]   Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
[4294675.222000]   General self-test: passed.
[4294675.222000]   Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
[4294675.222000]   Internal registers self-test: passed.
[4294675.222000]   ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x24c9f043).
[4294675.222000]   Receiver lock-up workaround activated.

I have other boards and I do not recall seeing the message about the 
Receiver lock-up bug, could this be part of the reason for the TX 
underrun?

Does it matter which PCI slot I place this card in?  It is currently right 
next to a PCI 3com 509 (thinnet).

$ cat /proc/interrupts 
           CPU0       CPU1       
  0:    6938534          0    IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:        205          0    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  4:      75106          0    IO-APIC-edge  serial
  8:          1          0    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 12:       9106          0    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 14:     157428          2    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 15:      63295          2    IO-APIC-edge  ide1
 16:    1224358          0   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 17:     171170          0   IO-APIC-level  eth2, eth3
 18:       4017          0   IO-APIC-level  eth1
 19:      68950          0   IO-APIC-level  ide2, ide3
 20:       6090          0   IO-APIC-level  Intel ICH5
NMI:          0          0 
LOC:    6938508    6938562 
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

Would increasing the txqueuelen fix this issue?  Or should I replace the 
NIC to get rid of these messages?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Justin.