From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Timeline for migrating to newer Linux kernels? Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:20:03 -0800 Message-ID: <4599B343.2060908@goop.org> References: <45985425.6010307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45985425.6010307@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Rik van Riel Cc: "Zulauf, John" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Rik van Riel wrote: > If XenSource has any intention of having Xen stay relevant > in the future, they'll want to seriously pursue an upstream > merge of their code. That's an active project. The paravirt ops patches have been laying the groundwork, and I'm planning on posting the Xen patches based on it in the next few days when I get back from vacation. Once Xen is in the kernel, the parallel project will be to make the hg Xen tree sync with it. There will still need to be some external patches, but they will diminish over time. J