From: r.marek@assembler.cz (Rudolf Marek)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] strange output values from W83627HG chip
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:17:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459AE7F8.5000604@assembler.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1167384671.4594e05f0a0df@www.inbox.lv>
Hi again,
>>> CPU1 Temp: +24.0?C (high = +75.0?C, hyst = +70.0?C)
>>> CPU2 Temp: +22.0?C (high = +75.0?C, hyst = +70.0?C)
>>> temp3: +30.5?C (high = +75.0?C, hyst = +70.0?C)
>>> temp4: -128.0?C (high = +75.0?C, hyst = +70.0?C)
>> Looks like temp4 is not connected.
>>
>>> temp5: +35?C (high = +50?C, hyst = +45?C)
>>> temp6: +16?C (high = +100?C, hyst = +95?C)
>>> cpu0_vid: +0.019 V (VRM Version 11.0)
>>> cpu1_vid: +0.019 V (VRM Version 11.0)
>>>
>> Please provide the output so we know what is what
>
> Ok.
> Here are results of `cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/device/temp?_type` :
>
> 6
> 6
> 6
> 6
They are all PECI
> 4 is thermistor
> 0
Hmmm question is what to do in the driver when temperature channel is disabled
We may:
1) not create the tempX_input file
2) when disabled remove tempX_input file
3) do nothing
Now we do 3)
> Following kernel docs, temp6 is disabled, so I put ignore line in sensors.conf for it
> now. Also, as I read manual for motherboard and tried to run superdoctor utility, I
> found that temp5 is System Motherboard temperature (36C looks like true)
Good. You have there Windows too? Or it runs linux?
> But why do you suggest to disable temp1-temp4? Yes, they are monitored through
> PECI and I can use coretemp driver instead?
I do? Ah that was just a guess that there is 0 (multi choice enumeration) Sorry
for that
> These are values from coretemp drivers (I have 2 CPU with 2 cores)
> cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon[1,2,3,4]/device/temp1_input
> 28000
> 28000
> 24000
> 27000
Hmm we should really push the driver to kernel :/
> Quote from Supermicro FAQ:
> "Q: PECI 1 and 2 have correct readings of 34 and 38 but PECI 3 and 4 show 0
> readings"
> "A: The reason is that the current Woodcrest CPU (Intel 51xx series CPU) only has
> one PECI Agent for each CPU and that is why you see only two readings."
But we see 3 of them... temp3 is not so bad... I don't know what happen with
the chip if PECI fails. (does not exist)
> This answer explains my strange values in temp3-temp4.
> So, am I right to use coretemp driver values instead of temp1-temp4 ones?
Yes you may use them instead.
> Also, I can't found anywhere in docs how to show coretemp values from sensors
> output! Now I can read them only from sysfs.
Please use latest SVN snapshot,
> Sorry for too many questions! :)
No problem.
Rudolf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-29 9:31 [lm-sensors] strange output values from W83627HG chip Jurijs Petrovs
2006-12-31 14:28 ` Rudolf Marek
2007-01-01 16:57 ` Jurijs Petrovs
2007-01-02 19:07 ` Rudolf Marek
2007-01-02 22:55 ` Jurijs Petrovs
2007-01-02 23:17 ` Rudolf Marek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459AE7F8.5000604@assembler.cz \
--to=r.marek@assembler.cz \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.