All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: fix combined mode (was Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released))
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:43:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <459AEE36.7080500@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070102232706.49340349@localhost.localdomain>

Alan wrote:
>> 2.6.0 - 2.6.19:  libata guarantees that all PCI BARs are reserved to the 
>> libata driver.
> 
> Please read the code Jeff. The old IDE quirk code in the PCI layer blanked
> BAR 0 to BAR 3 of a compatibility mode controller

(a) I'm well of aware of this, and (b) that changes nothing.

I said "PCI BARs" for a reason.  libata was written according to the 
following model:

	1) Programmatically reserve /all/ resources associated with
	   our PCI device
	2) Manually reserve resources associated with our PCI device,
	   but are not listed in struct pci_dev.

You have changed this to:

	1) Manually reserve /some/ resources associated with PCI device
	2) Manually reserve resources associated with our PCI device,
	   but are not listed in struct pci_dev.

But then 2.6.21 goes back to:

	1) Programmatically reserve /all/ resources associated with
	   our PCI device
	2) Manually reserve resources associated with our PCI device,
	   but are not listed in struct pci_dev.

Maybe I can say it more clearly by telling you how to fix the regression 
you have introduced:  Loop through all BAR resources in struct pci_dev, 
and reserve them if they are not already reserved by libata earlier in 
the code.  There.  Regression fixed.

(but then we rewrite this code again in 2.6.21)


> You then request_region 0x1f0 and 0x170 (BAR 0 and BAR 2) directly. You
> never request the legacy BAR 1 and BAR 3 because they were erased by the
> PCI quirk code and thus never claim the other port. Thats been a bug since
> day one but it never seemed worth fixing in the short term.

Yes -- that's a bug, one that existed prior to the "it doesn't boot" 
combined mode regression everybody complained about.  I'm talking about 
a new regression just introduced via 
dc3c3377f03634d351fafdfe35b237b283586c04, not a old bug that existed 
prior to the regression introduced in 
368c73d4f689dae0807d0a2aa74c61fd2b9b075f.

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-02 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-01  1:19 Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released) Linus Torvalds
2007-01-01  1:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-01-01  2:40 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-01-01  7:22 ` Cyrill V. Gorcnov
     [not found]   ` <4598BC0F.6070003@vc.cvut.cz>
2007-01-01  9:41     ` Cyrill V. Gorcnov
2007-01-02  2:19   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-01 11:29 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2007-01-01 13:28 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-01-01 20:13   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-01 20:49     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-01 21:31       ` Alan
2007-01-01 23:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-02  2:32           ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-02 11:58       ` [PATCH] libata: fix combined mode (was Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released)) Alan
2007-01-02 12:07         ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-01-02 14:00           ` Alan
2007-01-02 16:12         ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-02 21:00         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-02 21:27           ` Alan
2007-01-02 21:29             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-02 21:32               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-02 22:48                 ` Alan
2007-01-02 22:45               ` Alan
2007-01-02 23:01                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-02 23:27                   ` Alan
2007-01-02 23:43                     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-01-03  0:36                       ` Alan
2007-01-03  1:02                         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-02 23:54                     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-03  0:39                       ` Alan
2007-01-02 23:04                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-03 19:59         ` Steve Wise
2007-01-01 21:26     ` Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released) Alan
2007-01-02 16:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-01 15:52 ` Olaf Hering
2007-01-02 19:16 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 19:16   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 18:15   ` Steve Youngs
2007-01-03 20:03     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 19:24 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known regressions with patches available (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 19:24   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 19:26   ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 19:34     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 20:45       ` Rene Herman
2007-01-02 20:51         ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 19:30 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known regressions with patches available (part 2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 19:06 ` [2.6.20-rc3] INFO: possible recursive locking detected (was: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released)) Tilman Schmidt
2007-01-03 20:59 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 20:59   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-04 13:23   ` Horst H. von Brand
2007-01-04 13:23     ` Horst H. von Brand
2007-01-05  0:25   ` 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3) Horst H. von Brand
2007-01-05  0:25     ` Horst H. von Brand
2007-01-03 21:04 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 21:04   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 21:30   ` Jiri Kosina
2007-01-03 21:32     ` Jiri Kosina
2007-01-04 17:46 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-04 18:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-01-06 21:04 ` 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v4) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-06 21:04   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-06 22:06   ` Brice Goglin
2007-01-07 23:49     ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=459AEE36.7080500@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=alessandro.suardi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.