From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1H399m-00036g-Pt for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:52:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H399j-00033x-7u for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:52:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H399h-00032w-Q8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:52:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H399h-00032K-5J for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:52:05 -0500 Received: from [62.142.5.109] (helo=emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H399g-00007p-Ga for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:52:04 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (85-156-56-96.elisa-mobile.fi [85.156.56.96]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DF8158AFE for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:51:59 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <459F7F7C.2050207@nic.fi> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:52:44 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmVzYSBKw6TDpHNrZWzDpGluZW4=?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20070104170710.0820469802@eg1.dns77.com> <459F4E28.2020403@trixtar.org> In-Reply-To: <459F4E28.2020403@trixtar.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Does grub2 support background image? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:52:09 -0000 kf-grb@trixtar.org wrote: >> Message-ID: <00de01c72fd9$984361f0$1b280a0a@IBM8430AC6AE12> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"gb2312" >> >> hi,all >> >> Will grub2 support backgroud image under the terminal gfxterm?=20 >> I think it feels much better if grub2 can support something like=20 >> grub legacy 's splashimage. >=20 > Hello all, I'm new to the group & a non-programmer. >=20 > Whatever grub2 can support for those who need it and feel > good about is fine for them. I for one prefer to keep=20 > anything related to booting as simple and as bulletproof > as possible. >=20 > My request is that the rudimentary KISS mechanisms remain > definitely (if optionally) available. I would even propose=20 > that the simplest possible method always be the default one. Hi, It will stay optional... You can even survive without graphics mode. Or at least this has been the plan as far I know. Thanks, Vesa J=C3=A4=C3=A4skel=C3=A4inen