All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Woody Suwalski <woodys@xandros.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3 1/3] rtc-cmos driver
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:17:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <459FD993.3070909@xandros.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701051933.26368.david-b@pacbell.net>

David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 05 January 2007 7:10 pm, David Brownell wrote:
>   
>> On Friday 05 January 2007 12:45 pm, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>>  I'd appreciate if someone (Woody?) can test
>>>  this code on ARM.
>>>       
>> There are PPC, M68K, SPARC, and other boards that could also
>> use this; ARMs tend to integrate some other RTC on-chip.  But
>> on whatever non-PC platform is involved in such sanity testing,
>> that involves adding a platform_device to board setup code.
>>     
>
> Let me put that differently.  That should be done as a separate
> patch, adding (a) that platform_device, and maybe platform_data
> if it's got additional alarm registers, and (b) Kconfig support
> to let that work.  I'd call it a "patch #4 of 3".  ;)
>
> The current Kconfig uses:
>
>   
>> +config RTC_DRV_CMOS
>> +       tristate "CMOS real time clock"
>> +       depends on RTC_CLASS && (X86_PC || ACPI)
>>     
>
> Eventually maybe the PC-or-ACPI stuff should vanish, but IMO
> not until this code has been used on a few other platforms.
>
> - Dave
>   
I will try to play with the new code on Monday on ARM...

Thanks, Woody

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-06 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-05 18:01 [patch 2.6.20-rc3 1/3] rtc-cmos driver David Brownell
2007-01-05 20:45 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-01-06  3:10   ` David Brownell
2007-01-06  3:33     ` David Brownell
2007-01-06 17:17       ` Woody Suwalski [this message]
2007-01-06 21:17         ` David Brownell
2007-01-07  9:02           ` Russell King
2007-01-09 16:37             ` Woody Suwalski
2007-01-10  0:01               ` David Brownell
2007-01-10  5:27                 ` David Brownell
2007-05-28 18:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28 21:07   ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=459FD993.3070909@xandros.com \
    --to=woodys@xandros.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.