From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: libata error handling
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:01:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459FF1F8.1050306@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168109874.1512.11.camel@localhost>
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
>>> i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
>>> made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
>>> true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
>>> extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
>>> errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
>>> perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
>> Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..
> how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered
> this error then?
Pretty sure, I'm quite certain libata never does any silent error recovery..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-06 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.pdj7pJD9C08bRZatFINV1hz1oyA@ifi.uio.no>
2007-01-06 18:21 ` libata error handling Robert Hancock
2007-01-06 18:57 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-06 19:01 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-01-06 19:08 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-06 19:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-01-07 20:07 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-07 20:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-01-06 14:26 Kasper Sandberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-29 5:06 [RFC][PATCH] libata ATAPI alignment Jeff Garzik
2005-08-07 5:48 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 3:49 ` libata error handling Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 5:40 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 5:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 19:00 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 18:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 19:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 20:03 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 20:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 20:43 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 21:10 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 22:37 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 20:29 ` Mike Anderson
2005-08-19 21:02 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459FF1F8.1050306@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.