From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H3rTh-0004It-TF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:11:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H3rTd-0004FO-V3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:11:41 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3rTd-0004F8-Mf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:11:37 -0500 Received: from [195.252.0.52] (helo=zebra.uas.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H3rTc-0004VL-8z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:11:37 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.252.0.249]) by zebra.uas.se (PMDF V6.0-24 #39208) with ESMTP id <01MBONJ6T16Q007NZG@zebra.uas.se> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:11:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:11:31 +0100 From: Dan Sandberg Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] win98 slow with kqemu In-reply-to: <200701061743.11495.mr@ramendik.ru> Message-id: <45A218D3.2050801@medsci.uu.se> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200612301809.30656.mr@ramendik.ru> <459A561A.4050704@medsci.uu.se> <200701061743.11495.mr@ramendik.ru> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org ...also make sure that you have installed the CPU usage reduction fix for Windows 98, se manual: 3.11.2.2 (The link in the manual seems to be dead, but working ones can be found using Google.) /Dan Mikhail Ramendik wrote: >On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:54, Dan Sandberg wrote: > > > >>On the other hand, if for instance VMware is able to run Windows 98 much >>faster (I do not have it so I can't test this) then my guess is that >>kqemu is the guilty part and does something wrong with 16-bit code. >> >> > >Thanks. Will test with VMWare and report. > > >