From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outmx023.isp.belgacom.be (outmx023.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.4.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A26DDDDB for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:18:18 +1100 (EST) Received: from outmx023.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx023.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l08DI7t9011601 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:18:10 +0100 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <45A24411.4030501@246tNt.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:16:01 +0100 From: Sylvain Munaut MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sylvain Munaut Subject: Re: [PATCH] Probe Efika platform before CHRP. References: <17799.34168.811328.653008@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1166528379.19254.69.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4587D338.7060906@246tNt.com> <1166538553.25827.99.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1166558300.19254.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167773388.22068.443.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1167773863.6165.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167775493.3660.23.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <528646bc0701021504k88682bl765fad4c100bd40e@mail.gmail.com> <45A01416.6080401@genesi-usa.com> <528646bc0701061423o270df3dfj9d27d5572840ec79@mail.gmail.com> <45A1535C.1080007@genesi-usa.com> <1168222654.14763.92.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <45A20C66.8060506@genesi-usa.com> <45A23E8E.7010209@246tNt.com> In-Reply-To: <45A23E8E.7010209@246tNt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: bbrv@genesi-usa.com, David Woodhouse , Paul Mackerras , Linux PPC DEV List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sylvain Munaut wrote: > 2) What I'd really like to see fixed (but that I can't mark as > 'bugs' as obviously as the other) > - The compatible properties of system node (like sram, > bestcomm and pic) should at least include the mpc52xx-... > strings as defined in the 'linux' bindings. Better than > include, be exacty what has been defined but include would > "do the trick". > Forgot something here : The "bestcomm" node should have all the interrupts for all task in it's interrupts property instead of a non existent IRQ. Currently it does have <2 0 3> which doesn't really exists (it's the casaded interrupt IIRC, this is from memory, no time to check that now). And it should have <3 0 0> <3 1 0> .... <3 15 0>. Because those are really bestcomm interrupt and I think they do belong there. I know I can find thos in your "bestcomm-txtask bestcomm-rxtask" nodes for preloaded tasks and it's good they are there. But what if I want to use DMA for PSC6 where you didn't load anytask ... I can find some free ram in the sram node, some non-used tasks id but I got nowhere to find the interrupt ... So I'd like to have them there as well ... Sylvain