From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
Krzysztof Oledzki <olenf@ans.pl>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: connbytes & 64bit counters
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:36:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A4EBC8.60304@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612250252060.27316@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> OK, maybe something like this can be accepted - no ifdefs, 64 bit
> counters unconditionally for both ip_conntrack/nf_conntrack. If someone
> needs to save memory it is IMHO better to simply disable accounting at all.
Or ideally have a runtime option. Something to keep in mind when
redesigning the nf_conntrack allocation scheme.
> [NETFILTER] Reimplementation of 64bit counters for bytes/packets accounting
>
> Initially netfilter has had 64bit counters for conntrack-based
> accounting, but
> it was changed in 2.6.14 to save memory. Unfortunately in-kernel 64bit
> counters are
> still required, for example with "connbytes" extension.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
>
> diff -Nur
> linux-2.6.19.1-orig/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> --- linux-2.6.19.1-orig/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> 2006-12-11 20:32:53.000000000 +0100
> +++
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> 2006-12-22 21:15:10.000000000 +0100
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
> IPCT_NATINFO_BIT = 10,
> IPCT_NATINFO = (1 << IPCT_NATINFO_BIT),
>
> - /* Counter highest bit has been set */
> + /* Counter highest bit has been set - UNUSED */
> IPCT_COUNTER_FILLING_BIT = 11,
> IPCT_COUNTER_FILLING = (1 << IPCT_COUNTER_FILLING_BIT),
No need to keep this.
> @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> struct ip_conntrack_counter
> {
> - u_int32_t packets;
> - u_int32_t bytes;
> + u_int64_t packets;
> + u_int64_t bytes;
> };
>
> struct ip_conntrack_stat
> diff -Nur
> linux-2.6.19.1-orig/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h
> --- linux-2.6.19.1-orig/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h
> 2006-12-11 20:32:53.000000000 +0100
> +++
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h
> 2006-12-22 21:15:26.000000000 +0100
> @@ -89,10 +89,10 @@
>
> enum ctattr_counters {
> CTA_COUNTERS_UNSPEC,
> - CTA_COUNTERS_PACKETS, /* old 64bit counters */
> - CTA_COUNTERS_BYTES, /* old 64bit counters */
> - CTA_COUNTERS32_PACKETS,
> - CTA_COUNTERS32_BYTES,
> + CTA_COUNTERS_PACKETS, /* 64bit counters */
> + CTA_COUNTERS_BYTES, /* 64bit counters */
> + CTA_COUNTERS32_PACKETS, /* unused */
> + CTA_COUNTERS32_BYTES, /* unused */
> __CTA_COUNTERS_MAX
> };
> #define CTA_COUNTERS_MAX (__CTA_COUNTERS_MAX - 1)
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.19.1-orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
> --- linux-2.6.19.1-orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
> 2006-12-11 20:32:53.000000000 +0100
> +++
> linux-2.6.19.1-64bitconntrack/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
> 2006-12-22 21:13:35.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1148,9 +1148,6 @@
> ct->counters[CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo)].packets++;
> ct->counters[CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo)].bytes +=
> ntohs(skb->nh.iph->tot_len);
> - if ((ct->counters[CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo)].packets & 0x80000000)
> - || (ct->counters[CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo)].bytes & 0x80000000))
> - event |= IPCT_COUNTER_FILLING;
This was actually broken before, since the counters are not
reset (they just overflow) an event was generated for every
packet until the overflow once they reached 2^31. Anyway,
I'm not sure how ulogd2 uses these counters, Harald, is it
necessary to receive period updates?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-10 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-24 22:53 connbytes & 64bit counters Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-10-25 22:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-28 16:48 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-10-30 12:01 ` Amin Azez
2006-10-30 15:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-30 20:01 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-11-23 14:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-11-23 21:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-11-24 9:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-12-25 1:59 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-01-10 13:36 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-01-15 10:45 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-01-15 14:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-20 22:13 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-07-20 22:42 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-07-21 4:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-21 16:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-23 2:27 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
[not found] ` <200707230227.l6N2R1hs010163@toshiba.co.jp>
2007-08-06 11:30 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-08-29 11:31 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-11-01 15:08 ` Amin Azez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45A4EBC8.60304@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=ole@ans.pl \
--cc=olenf@ans.pl \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.