All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [POWERPC] Make it blatantly clear;	mpc5200 device tree is not yet stable
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:14:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B07DF1.6020301@246tNt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1169190014769-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Acked-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>


It's purely documentation so quite unlikely to break stuff ;) And it's
real important people know it.



PS: Grant, it's 246 in my email not 346 ;)

grant.likely@secretlab.ca wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> Documentation-only change.  The 5200 device tree layout has not yet
> stablized, so nobody should depend on the layout of the tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> ---
> Paul,
>
> (minor rework from comments received)
>
> I know it's *very* late in the .20 release cycle, but I don't want to
> allow false assumptions about the stability of the 5200 device tree
> bindings.
>
> Please apply for 2.6.20 If you think it is appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> g.
>
>  .../powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt       |    6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts                 |    6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts                |    6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> index 7fb3b8a..69f016f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ MPC52xx Device Tree Bindings
>  (c) 2006 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
>  Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>  
> +********** DRAFT ***********
> +* WARNING: Do not depend on the stability of these bindings just yet.
> +* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> +* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> +********** DRAFT ***********
> +
>  I - Introduction
>  ================
>  Boards supported by the arch/powerpc architecture require device tree be
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> index a8efb59..1868707 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>   * option) any later version.
>   */
>  
> +/*
> + * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
> + * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> + * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> + */
> +
>  / {
>  	model = "Lite5200";
>  	compatible = "lite5200\0lite52xx\0mpc5200\0mpc52xx";
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> index 1aabee4..5bb2760 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>   * option) any later version.
>   */
>  
> +/*
> + * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
> + * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> + * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> + */
> +
>  / {
>  	model = "Lite5200b";
>  	compatible = "lite5200b\0lite52xx\0mpc5200b\0mpc52xx";
>   

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-19  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-19  7:00 [POWERPC] Make it blatantly clear; mpc5200 device tree is not yet stable grant.likely
2007-01-19  8:14 ` Sylvain Munaut [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45B07DF1.6020301@246tNt.com \
    --to=tnt@246tnt.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.