From: Theo Veenker <Theo.Veenker@domain.hid>
To: rpm@xenomai.org
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] irq conflict
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:52:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B086B1.3060105@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1169152829.25556.25.camel@domain.hid>
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 21:09 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>>Theo Veenker wrote:
>>
>>>Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>>Theo Veenker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>I need to run xenomai on a HP Compaq nc6320. I use kernel 2.6.17.14
>>>>>and xenomai 2.2.5. The non-realtime kernel runs fine on this laptop,
>>>>
>>>>Means the same kernel with I-pipe (and Xenomai) disabled or the same
>>>>kernel version and .config, but unpatched?
>>>
>>>The latter.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>but the xenomai pactched kernel gives several of these messages:
>>>>>
>>>>> IRQ routing conflict for xxxx.xx.xx.x, have irq 11, want irq 10
>>>>>
>>>>>And some things (e.g. mouse, network) then don't work, not properly
>>>>>anyway. The same kernel runs fine however on other systems.
>>>>>
>>>>>Any clue what I can do about it?
>>>>
>>>>Please provide bootlogs for both rt and non-rt kernel startup. And the
>>>>.config.
>>>
>>>I 'solved' it by enabling ACPI (without processor module and others).
>>>Looks good. I don't see high latencies with the latency test. Under
>>>what conditions might ACPI affect real-time behaviour?
>>
>>CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR, because it allows deep sleep states with
>>significant wakeup latencies.
>>
>>But back to your original issue: You mean your notebook booted fine
>>under vanilla Linux with ACPI disabled? That would mean I-pipe relies on
>>ACPI here without stating this anywhere. In that case /something/ needs
>>fixing: code, config deps, or doc.
>>
>
>
> It doesn't, at least, not willingly. Before drawing any conclusion,
> please try 2.6.19 with the same configuration first: the generic irq
> layer may have had a positive influence on the I-pipe in this area.
I'd love to try it, but there is no 2.6.19 patch for 2.2.5. When 2.3
was released I tried using that, but failed (unable to load the posix
module or something I don't remember exactly). Since I had only a few
days to convert all our systems (for language and speech research)
from RTLinux to Xenomai I decided to stay at 2.2.5 until quieter
times. Hope to figure it out soon.
Theo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-19 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 9:35 [Xenomai-help] irq conflict Theo Veenker
2007-01-17 22:56 ` Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <45AFC392.5050705@domain.hid>
2007-01-18 20:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-01-18 20:40 ` Philippe Gerum
2007-01-19 8:52 ` Theo Veenker [this message]
2007-01-19 8:38 ` Theo Veenker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B086B1.3060105@domain.hid \
--to=theo.veenker@domain.hid \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.