From: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
To: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@gentoo.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:14:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B0EE71.5040908@nagafix.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1169222858.11134.52.camel@athena.fprintf.net>
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:00 +0000, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Is anyone else having stability problems on AMD64? Or am I the only one
>> using it?
>> Not only is x86 UML broken on AMD64, I am also getting (seemingly)
>> random crashes running 64-bit UML.
>> The Gentoo guests in particular randomly fail to compile code - failing
>> in completely random places. When you try again, it might work or just
>> fail later when you run the binary...
>> These used to work reliably before so I am not just doing it wrong (as
>> is often the case ;)
>> To summarize, that leaves us with:
>> * x86 unable to run kernels 2.6 due to a bug in host >2.6.16
>> (and most x86 guests require 2.6 to use latest glibc)
>> * amd64 unable to run x86 guests
>> * amd64 unable to run amd64 guests reliably
>> ...
>>
>
> I'm the gentoo usermode-sources maintainer, and I run UML almost
> exclusively on amd64. I have, at any given time, from 4 to 20 UMLs
> running on my main dev box, most of them 32-bit, and I haven't had any
> stability problems.
Can you send me more details of your setup as I am quite experienced
with UML and now completely stuck with AMD64.
> Is your RAM OK?
Oh yes, this has nothing to do with the hardware.
> Which kernels do you have inside and outside?
Host (outside):
2.6.19.2-skas3-v8.2
Inside: pick any of those (none of them work with >=2.6.16):
http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/
> How are
> you trying to build the 32-bit UMLs?
These are the same as on the site above (which I maintain) and these
have worked flawlessly for a long long time.
I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and running
again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just not an
option for some of the amd64 boxes.
Thanks
Antoine
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-19 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 16:15 [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Blaisorblade
2007-01-17 18:17 ` Christopher S. Aker
2007-01-17 18:15 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-17 19:50 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 11:00 ` [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64? Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 16:07 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-01-19 16:14 ` Antoine Martin [this message]
2007-01-19 16:38 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-01-19 16:42 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 17:33 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 19:56 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-21 9:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-01-21 13:04 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-23 15:20 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-01-21 14:38 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-21 14:46 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-21 14:55 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-21 16:11 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-22 22:09 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-23 0:59 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 16:38 ` Antoine Martin
2007-02-15 3:43 ` [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Blaisorblade
2007-01-19 23:31 ` Blaisorblade
2007-01-17 23:26 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-19 23:18 ` Blaisorblade
2007-01-22 20:59 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-23 8:09 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B0EE71.5040908@nagafix.co.uk \
--to=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=dang@gentoo.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.