From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.111.4.28] (helo=out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H9bs4-0000LL-QO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:44:36 +0100 Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BEE9460B for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:44:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:44:36 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: cUVyqfbOzTvytAJhIIdjaGGRnd7M1WCUGlAK0QDblW40 1169621075 Received: from [192.168.76.11] (secure.astc-design.com [203.122.250.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B580293B8 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:44:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45B70051.8000009@whitby.id.au> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:14:33 +1030 From: Rod Whitby User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <45B40165.6000506@whitby.id.au> <45B4EDCD.1060609@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <45B50D16.8060001@whitby.id.au> <45B518A5.8000500@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <45B5528F.3050108@whitby.id.au> <1169550792.5845.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45B663F8.5030901@whitby.id.au> <1169584472.5845.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45B6FF94.8050500@whitby.id.au> In-Reply-To: <45B6FF94.8050500@whitby.id.au> Subject: Re: SITEINFO_ENDIAN(N)ESS (NN, not N) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:44:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rod Whitby wrote: > Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 06:07 +1030, Rod Whitby wrote: >>> Are you referring to the existing SITEINFO_ENDIANESS (sic) variable >>> (which I only just found ...) ? >> Yes. > > Shouldn't it be spelled SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS? (i.e. double N) > > (Both Google and Wikipedia say that it is endianness, not endianess) > > Anyone object to me changing the 4 places it's currently used, before I > use it in 73 new places? Scratch that, I just found the 71 other existing places where endianess is used in lower-case :-( I'll remain consistent with the existing speling (sic). -- Rod