From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <45B7D73A.2000209@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:01:30 +0000
From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <45B7BCD4.4030506@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <45B7BCD4.4030506@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] PDAPI spec part 1
List-Id: Printing architecture under linux
	<printing-architecture.lists.freestandards.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture>,
	<mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.freestandards.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freestandards.org/pipermail/printing-architecture>
List-Post: <mailto:printing-architecture@lists.freestandards.org>
List-Help: <mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.freestandards.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture>,
	<mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.freestandards.org?subject=subscribe>
To: printing-architecture@lists.freestandards.org

There will be no part 2, the rest of the document seems OK for me.

    Till

Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Hi, I am current;y looking through the PDAPI spec
> 
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/fsg/vector/pdapi-spec-1.0-20061205.pdf
> 
> Here are my observations:
> 
> Page 9, line 4, section 3.5 Alpha Composition: Should we really have 
> this section where the alpha composition is not supported yet?
> 
> Page 9, line 8, section 3.6 Scan Rule: I do not really understand this 
> section. I think the wording should be redone to make this section more 
> clear.
> 
>    Till
>