From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ncpfs and TCP vs UDP
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:54:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45BA2437.4000803@drzeus.cx> (raw)
Hi Petr,
I was hoping you could give me some input on another concern I have.
Which of TCP and UDP is the preferred transport for NCP? The client for
Windows seems to use TCP, which would suggest that that is the most
tested dialect. I also did a quick test with bonnie++:
UDP:
Version 1.03 -----Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
500M 1569 19 1714 10 826 9 1414 18 1569 9 65.2 3
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 460 14 897 16 556 15 491 15 1131 13 320 6
poseidon.drzeus.cx,500M,1569,19,1714,10,826,9,1414,18,1569,9,65.2,3,16,460,14,897,16,556,15,491,15,1131,13,320,6
TCP:
Version 1.03 -----Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
500M 1653 19 3711 11 2312 9 1419 18 4489 6 91.5 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 483 14 912 15 587 14 483 14 1176 13 287 6
poseidon.drzeus.cx,500M,1653,19,3711,11,2312,9,1419,18,4489,6,91.5,1,16,483,14,912,15,587,14,483,14,1176,13,287,6
TCP has roughly twice the throughput of UDP. Note that this was done
against a vmware machine that wasn't exactly maxing out the network.
Input welcome.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 15:54 Pierre Ossman [this message]
2007-01-26 21:20 ` ncpfs and TCP vs UDP vandrove
2007-01-27 14:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-27 15:03 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-01-27 16:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45BA2437.4000803@drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.