From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:30:28 -0500 Message-ID: <45BE7584.8040808@redhat.com> References: <200701242346.44673.pluto@agmk.net> <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254" To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYSB3cm90ZToKPiBPbiBUaHVyc2RheSAyNSBvZiBKYW51YXJ5IDIwMDcgMDU6 NTA6NDUgTGVuIEJyb3duIHdyb3RlOgo+ICAgCj4+IE9uIFdlZG5lc2RheSAyNCBKYW51YXJ5IDIw MDcgMTc6NTIsIEFkcmlhbiBCdW5rIHdyb3RlOgo+PiAgICAgCj4+PiBPbiBXZWQsIEphbiAyNCwg MjAwNyBhdCAxMTo0Njo0NFBNICswMTAwLCBQYXdlxYIgU2lrb3JhIHdyb3RlOgo+Pj4gICAgICAg Cj4+Pj4gZm9yIDIuNi4yMHJjNSBpIGdldCBhbiBhY3BpIHJlbGF0ZWQgb29wcyBkdXJpbmcgeDg2 LTY0IGJvb3Q6Cj4+Pj4gaHR0cDovL21pbnVzLmRzMTQuYWdoLmVkdS5wbC9+cGx1dG8vMi42LjIw cmM1LWFjcGktb29wcy5qcGcKPj4+PiBkaXNhYmxpbmcgdGhlICJhbWQtazggY29vbCduJ3F1aWV0 IiBvcHRpb24gaW4gYmlvcyBoZWxwcy4KPj4+PiBtb3Jlb3ZlciwgaXQgd29ya3MgZmluZSBmb3Ig Mi42LjE3LjEzLCBzbyBpdCBsb29rcyBsaWtlCj4+Pj4gYSByZWNlbnQgcmVncmVzc2lvbi4gaSBj YW4gcHJvdmlkZSBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMgaWYgeW91IG5lZWQuCj4+Pj4gICAgICAgICAKPj4+IHRo YW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciByZXBvcnQuCj4+Pgo+Pj4gQ2FuIHlvdSBuYXJyb3cgZG93biBhIGJpdCB3 aGVuIGl0IHN0YXJ0ZWQ/Cj4+PiBJcyAyLjYuMTkgT0s/Cj4+PiBJcyAyLjYuMTggT0s/Cj4+PiAg ICAgICAKPj4gSXMgdGhlIHN0YWNrIHRyYWNlIGFsd2F5cyB0aGUgc2FtZT8gIEl0IGRvZXNuJ3Qg bWFrZSBtdWNoIHNlbnNlIHRvIG1lLgo+PiAgICAgCj4KPiB3aXRoIGRlYnVnIG9wdGlvbnMgZW5h YmxlZCBvb3BzIGxvb2tzIGJldHRlcjoKPiBodHRwOi8vbWludXMuZHMxNC5hZ2guZWR1LnBsL35w bHV0by8yLjYuMjByYzUtb29wcy0wMS5qcGcKPgo+ICAgCgpJbiBfX3JtcXVldWUoKSAobW0vcGFn ZV9hbGxvYy5jIGxpbmUgNjE5OgoKc3RhdGljIHN0cnVjdCBwYWdlICpfX3JtcXVldWUoc3RydWN0 IHpvbmUgKnpvbmUsIHVuc2lnbmVkIGludCBvcmRlcikKewogICAgICAgIHN0cnVjdCBmcmVlX2Fy ZWEgKiBhcmVhOwogICAgICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGludCBjdXJyZW50X29yZGVyOwogICAgICAgIHN0 cnVjdCBwYWdlICpwYWdlOwoKICAgICAgICBmb3IgKGN1cnJlbnRfb3JkZXIgPSBvcmRlcjsgY3Vy cmVudF9vcmRlciA8IE1BWF9PUkRFUjsKKytjdXJyZW50X29yZGVyKSB7CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBhcmVhID0gem9uZS0+ZnJlZV9hcmVhICsgY3VycmVudF9vcmRlcjsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IGlmIChsaXN0X2VtcHR5KCZhcmVhLT5mcmVlX2xpc3QpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBjb250aW51ZTsKCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBwYWdlID0gbGlzdF9lbnRyeShhcmVhLT5mcmVl X2xpc3QubmV4dCwgc3RydWN0IHBhZ2UsIGxydSk7CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBsaXN0X2RlbCgm cGFnZS0+bHJ1KTsgICA8PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBybXZf cGFnZV9vcmRlcihwYWdlKTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGFyZWEtPm5yX2ZyZWUtLTsKCnBhZ2Ut PmxydSBpcyBOVUxM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:30:28 -0500 Message-ID: <45BE7584.8040808@redhat.com> References: <200701242346.44673.pluto@agmk.net> <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Paweł Sikora wrote: > On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote: > >> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>> >>>> for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot: >>>> http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg >>>> disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps. >>>> moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like >>>> a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need. >>>> >>> thanks for your report. >>> >>> Can you narrow down a bit when it started? >>> Is 2.6.19 OK? >>> Is 2.6.18 OK? >>> >> Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me. >> > > with debug options enabled oops looks better: > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-oops-01.jpg > > In __rmqueue() (mm/page_alloc.c line 619: static struct page *__rmqueue(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) { struct free_area * area; unsigned int current_order; struct page *page; for (current_order = order; current_order < MAX_ORDER; ++current_order) { area = zone->free_area + current_order; if (list_empty(&area->free_list)) continue; page = list_entry(area->free_list.next, struct page, lru); list_del(&page->lru); <===================== rmv_page_order(page); area->nr_free--; page->lru is NULL From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932991AbXA2WeS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932941AbXA2WeS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:56306 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932834AbXA2WeR (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:17 -0500 Message-ID: <45BE7584.8040808@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:30:28 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Adrian Bunk , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). References: <200701242346.44673.pluto@agmk.net> <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> In-Reply-To: <200701252311.46858.pluto@agmk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paweł Sikora wrote: > On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote: > >> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>> >>>> for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot: >>>> http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg >>>> disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps. >>>> moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like >>>> a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need. >>>> >>> thanks for your report. >>> >>> Can you narrow down a bit when it started? >>> Is 2.6.19 OK? >>> Is 2.6.18 OK? >>> >> Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me. >> > > with debug options enabled oops looks better: > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-oops-01.jpg > > In __rmqueue() (mm/page_alloc.c line 619: static struct page *__rmqueue(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) { struct free_area * area; unsigned int current_order; struct page *page; for (current_order = order; current_order < MAX_ORDER; ++current_order) { area = zone->free_area + current_order; if (list_empty(&area->free_list)) continue; page = list_entry(area->free_list.next, struct page, lru); list_del(&page->lru); <===================== rmv_page_order(page); area->nr_free--; page->lru is NULL