From: Yavuz Onder <yavuz@teksavvy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yavuz@teksavvy.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.19.2: bad reads/writes from/to CMOS clock
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:37:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45BEA162.3030204@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e18e56a85195bf4a507163df8e2f62e@teksavvy.com>
I have since found out that SMP kernels should(must?) have Enhanced RTC
support built-in.
It is stated in kernel config help for Enhanced RTC support, and I found
a number of references on the net as well.
Now I wonder why selecting SMP does not set Enhanced RTC support to "Y"
automatically?
I am building a kernel right now, and will monitor for a week or so,
then come back and report if it removes the problem.
Yavuz
yavuz@teksavvy.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running 2.6.19.2 kernel from kernel.org.
>
> This is my first SMP kernel.
>
> The problem I describe below has not happend with non-SMP kernels ever...
>
> I have installed my new AMD64 x2 4800 CPU just a few days ago. My mobo is Asus A8N SLI
> (Nvidia chipset).
>
> My problem with this new setup is that my CMOS clock is thrown off by varying
> amounts of time. I have seen system times as long as ten months into future, and as
> long as 25 days in the past. At the moment my system clock has correct
> hh:mm:ss, but it shows the date Jan 1st, instead of correct 25th.
>
> In last few days have systematically checked CMOS clock after shutdown and before
> boot-up.
>
> I have observed CMOS clock set to a wrong value, immediately after shutdown.
> I also ended up with a wrong system time following a boot after verifying
> correctness of the CMOS clock.
>
> Problem does not happen 100% of the time. But 6-7 times in a week is bad
> enough.
>
> I searched mailing list archives, and found some NMI-RTC race condition discussion,
> and some other discussions about timers not running, clock ticks being missed
> etc. But they were all at least one year old. The fixes to those should have found
> their way into 2.6.19 kernels.
>
> I would appreciate any ideas on how to follow-up on this problem.
>
> I am eager to try things, collect data as needed. Just tell me what to do.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
> Yavuz Onder
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 14:46 2.6.19.2: bad reads/writes from/to CMOS clock yavuz
2007-01-26 21:01 ` [x86-64, CMOS/RTC] " Oleg Verych
2007-01-30 1:37 ` Yavuz Onder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45BEA162.3030204@teksavvy.com \
--to=yavuz@teksavvy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.