From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: TJ <linux@tjworld.net>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] filesystem: Disk Errors at boot-time caused by probe of partitions
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:12:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C23BAA.5050400@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170329269.30563.10.camel@butch.lan.tjworld.net>
I think you may be barking up the wrong tree because IIRC, these
requests for data beyond the end of the disk never make it to the drive;
the kernel fails them in the block layer. There was a patch a while
back to fix the partition detection code to NOT request sectors beyond
the end of the disk, but I don't think it was ever merged.
In any case, if you are sure the requests are making it to the drive and
causing damage, I hope you give Maxtor and IBM a sound thrashing for
using retarded firmware.
TJ wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Yes, I'd have expected that too. I'm particularly surprised the
> drive-logic doesn't refuse to move the heads and just report the failure
> based on the LBA value.
>
> These are Maxtor drives, but its also happened with IBM drives in
> another system with similar configuration, as a test.
>
> During the bug-hunt (which started end of December) I built about 100
> kernels trying to track down the root cause, and therefore went through
> many reboot cycles.
>
> Several times the drives were 'knocked out' and would refuse to
> initialise during POST. The only remedy was to leave the system powered
> down for a while - the rest seemed to do them good.
>
> The difficulty I had in debugging was the errors are generated on the
> work-queue and interrupt handling side, and it was extremely difficult
> to pin-point the root cause because the symptoms (drive seek errors)
> occur well after the partition tables have been scanned, and also repeat
> themselves several times during system start-up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-01 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.vUjkpPQXmle+uox6D228qG85KCU@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-01 4:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] filesystem: Disk Errors at boot-time caused by probe of partitions Robert Hancock
2007-02-01 11:27 ` TJ
2007-02-01 19:12 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2007-02-01 20:42 ` Alan
2007-02-01 1:50 TJ
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-31 23:50 TJ
2007-02-01 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 22:47 ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-01 23:50 ` TJ
2007-02-02 0:10 ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-02 0:25 ` TJ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45C23BAA.5050400@cfl.rr.com \
--to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@tjworld.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.