From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <45C75C04.3090003@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:32:04 +0000 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB58201949F94@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB58201949F94@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] Distribution-independent printer driver package --first shot List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Wichmann, Mats D" Cc: printing-architecture@lists.freestandards.org, lsb-discuss Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > This error is real: > >> Error: Didn't see expected dependency lsb=3.1 > > while you say "it should work on any modern distro fulfilling > LSB 3.1" pkgchk thinks you didn't build the package with that > requirement. > I have intendedly left it out as the LSB Build Environment does not have an "lsb" package installed. It should have such a package (meta-package?) installed so that you can install LSB packages in it. Why can I not use "Requires lsb >= 3.1", are the LSBs not backward compatible? A package made for LSB 3.1 should also work under LSB 3.2. Or will the LSB 3.2 package contain "Provides: lsb 3.1, lsb 3.0"? Till