From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: Deprecation/Removal schedule Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:55:47 +0100 Message-ID: <45C896F3.5000007@op5.se> References: <7v8xfdnlqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 06 15:55:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HERjh-0007ZT-DR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:55:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752231AbXBFOzu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:55:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752229AbXBFOzu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:55:50 -0500 Received: from linux-server1.op5.se ([193.201.96.2]:55954 "EHLO smtp-gw1.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbXBFOzu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:55:50 -0500 Received: by smtp-gw1.op5.se (Postfix, from userid 588) id A4BDD6BCD0; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:55:48 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on linux-server1.op5.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by smtp-gw1.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DF36BCCF; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:55:47 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) In-Reply-To: <7v8xfdnlqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * git-lost-found > > Although it has served us well, I think it is about to outlive > its usefulness, thanks to the recent "reflog by default" > change. > Nonono. Please no. This has saved me more times than I can even care to remember. Especially whenever I'm teaching newcomers how to git. I really wouldn't want to not have it there in case its needed and some schmuck upgrades git and then loses something vital because he forgot to enable the reflog on an old repo. Does it add significantly to the maintenance burden? -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231