From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: mac-address vs. local-mac-address
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:22:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CA5130.2020006@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31D17474-FA61-4E0A-9114-FB6C965451FF@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
>> For most boards, the compiled-in option is just some random MAC
>> address. When the board is shipped, the manufacturer creates his own
>> set of environment variables and overrides what's stored on flash.
>
> And where does the mfg store these?
Ideally, on the Ethernet adapters's internal EEPROM. On non-OF systems, the
driver is supposed to read the MAC address from the hardware.
> Ok, so 'compiled-in' wasn't the best choice. What I meant is
> 'local-mac-address' is the MAC address u-boot decides to use when it
> boots before any user interaction.
I agree with that.
> (this may be the compiled-in one, or
> one from flash env settings, or whatever other source the board code
> decides).
Well, I think you mean that it should be only the environment variable. The
compiled-in version is just a default value for the environment, so that should
be ignored. On a few U-Boot Ethernet drivers, the driver queries the hardware
and fetches the MAC address from it. The driver then updates the environment
variable.
So in all case, when U-Boot boots the kernel, it should use the environment
variable to update local-mac-address, and leave mac-address alone. I'm trying
to get a consensus on this proposition.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-07 21:17 mac-address vs. local-mac-address Timur Tabi
2007-02-07 21:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-07 21:41 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07 21:46 ` Timur Tabi
2007-02-07 21:42 ` Timur Tabi
2007-02-07 21:51 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07 22:07 ` Timur Tabi
2007-02-07 22:14 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07 22:22 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-02-07 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-07 22:16 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45CA5130.2020006@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.