All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: Linux lock-up with rtcanrecv
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:43:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CAE2C5.1070108@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45CAE367.5040803@domain.hid>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1697 bytes --]

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> fiddling with latest Xenomai trunk and 2.3.x on one of our robots (there
>> is still a bug in trunk /wrt broken timeouts of rt_dev_read on
>> xeno_16550A - different issue...), I ran into a weird behaviour of
>> rtcanrecv:
>>
>> I have a continuous stream of a few thousand packets/s towards the
>> robot. When I start up two "rtcanrecv rtcan0 -p1000" instances (or one +
>> our own receiver application), the second one causes a Linux lock-up.
>> Sometimes this happens during startup of the second rtcanrecv, but at
>> latest on its termination. Other RT tasks are still running. I can
>> resolve the lock-up by pulling the CAN cable, everyone is fine
>> afterwards and can be cleaned up. I played with quite a few combinations
>> of recent ipipe patches and Xenomai revisions (even back to #1084 in
>> v2.3.x), no noticeable difference.
>>
>> Seems like I have to take a closer look - once time permits and the
>> robot is available. So any ideas or attempts to reproduce this are
>> welcome, current .config attached (no magic knob found there yet).
> 
> I will try to reporduce the problem a.s.a.p.

TiA.

> 
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> PS: Wolfgang, any objections against "decoupling" -v from -p and
>> lowering the receiver priority to 0?
> 
> No, -v with -p looks like a bug anyway. And does it make sense to define
> an option for the task priority?

I don't think so because a) the timestamps are recorded at IRQ level
anyway and we b) printf the result in secondary mode. My reason for
lowering the prio was to avoid the the receiver runs under Linux with
SCHED_FIFO.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-08  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-07 23:04 [Xenomai-core] Linux lock-up with rtcanrecv Jan Kiszka
2007-02-07 23:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-02-08  8:44   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-02-08  8:46 ` [Xenomai-core] " Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-02-08  8:43   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2007-02-08 12:28     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45CAE2C5.1070108@domain.hid \
    --to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=wg@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.