From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: behavioral change due to new elf code
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:00:30 +0100
Message-ID: <45CC7E7E.5060607@suse.de>
References: <45CC7EC1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <45CC7470.4060002@suse.de>
	<45CC86A5.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <45CC86A5.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan Beulich wrote:
> But wouldn't that change behavior for domU-s then in an undesirable way?

Why?  dom0 and domU should have the same behavior ...

> Even better, I would think, would be to split the note namespace to
> distinguish
> - general required notes
> - general optional notes
> - dom0 required notes

Point being?  I'm not aware of any dom0-required note.  And I don't
think splitting into required and optional is useful, especially as this
is arch-dependent ...

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>