Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:44 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
>>
>> RTnet revealed a problem of rtdm_task_sleep_until in trunk. When being
>> called with a past date, it blocks forever because xnpod_suspend_thread
>> considers such timeouts as infinite:
>>
>> http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/xenomai/lxr/source/ksrc/nucleus/pod.c?v=SVN-trunk#1456
>>
>> Are there users relying on this property of xnpod_suspend_thread? If
>> yes, I would unfortunately have to catch this case in RTDM.
>>
> 
> Here is the proposed change, absolutely untested; could you give this
> hell on your favourite RTNet torture? TIA,

No full test yet, but the scenario that failed before now works nicely.

Jan