From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45D0652D.4070500@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:01:33 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Multiple NIC trouble References: <17864.63903.244809.994959@domain.hid> <45C9B7C4.8050705@domain.hid> <45CB4291.408@domain.hid> <45CCA96C.7080605@domain.hid> <45D034FF.90900@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <45D034FF.90900@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai help Jan Kiszka wrote: > But can someone explain *why* there is a clash? Is it due to I-pipe > injecting tick events *aside* HPET-generated ticks? I think we should > address this clash when I-pipe has to be adopted to clock_event/dyntick > in 2.6.21. Maybe the rthal code assume that the local APIC is initialized, whereas it is not, when using the HPET ? -- Gilles Chanteperdrix