Re: [Xenomai-help] fata: removing non-linked element...

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1393 bytes --]

Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:07 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Stephan Zimmermann wrote:
>>>>> I wasn't able to isolate the section of my code that causes the crash by
>>>>> now. The only thing I figured out by now is that the particular crash
>>>>> does not happen with 2.3.x rev 2077.
>>>>> So I guess some change from 2077 to the 2139 revision did break something.
>>>> Could you track the issue a bit more down? There are not to many
>>>> "interesting" changes to 2.3.x. A few milestones I found in the ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>> - 2092: Allow sleeping scheduler locks
>>>> - 2108: Before RPI rework
>>>>
>>>> Anything after 2108 only makes sense to dissect when you switch on
>>> s,on,off,
>> Nope. If this switch is off, RPI is enabled while known to be buggy, right?
>>
> 
> Btw, RPI was not buggy so so that it could cause crashes; it was failing
> to _always_ keep a thread's priority consistent across domain migration,
> which is quite different. IOW, do not start switching on RPIDISABLE
> blindly when your box goes south, it's most likely unrelated to what has
> been fixed recently.

Well, I recalled some temporary locking changes on RPI somewhere in this
period. My feeling was to better exclude their potential side-effects
from the testing rounds.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]