From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Levedahl Subject: Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:28:22 -0500 Message-ID: <45D346B6.5020802@verizon.net> References: <45CFA30C.6030202@verizon.net> <200702130932.51601.litvinov2004@gmail.com> <7v7iumx7hu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v8xf1uxme.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <45D31C0E.2040206@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Levedahl , Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , Alexander Litvinov , Git Mailing List To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 14 18:28:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHNve-0003gt-HK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:28:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750901AbXBNR2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:28:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750865AbXBNR2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:28:22 -0500 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46]:43675 "EHLO vms046pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbXBNR2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:28:22 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([71.246.235.75]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JDG00CJQR74WL13@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:28:21 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Mark Levedahl wrote: > > This sounds regretfully complex. Somebody (you?) mentioned that cvsnt does > a kick-ass job here. Does cvsnt need strategies? I don't think so. Neither > do we. Someone who cares enough should just rip^H^H^Hlook at cvsnt's text > detection. > > Ciao, > Dscho > I agree that is complex, I started thinking of PAM when I wrote that, leading to, "this aint gonna work." But in the modern day let's all feel good spirit of "there are no stupid ideas, just some are better" I threw it out anyway. As to cvsnt, my actual feeling is I'd like to kick it in the ass, it has destroyed too many files for me over the years, binary and text, so I don't think its strategies are very good. That is why I'm kicking these ideas around, if I thought I knew the "right" way I would have written it already. Mark