From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CDADDD08 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:11:13 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45D49406.9010505@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:10:30 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] Add device tree for Ebony References: <20070213061026.5837FDDDE9@ozlabs.org><20070214002210.GE11491@localhost.localdomain><45afe653a3f963e21e58a063c09b1b22@kernel.crashing.org><20070214231734.GC16279@localhost.localdomain><90e2bb990b7e1f46c6eaccd1d9255d77@kernel.crashing.org> <865018a527ef1056f628250167301e64@kernel.crashing.org> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A1BAF0@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A1BAF0@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jon Loeliger , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > 1275 specifies whitespace inbetween, but isn't this due to > the way they are describing things for the forth / stack-based > operations? > > I would prefer in the DTS files to have no whitespace in > between-- seems much more readable > than . > > Or even better-- just use standard C notation > <1234 0x5678> > > That is very readable. Why bring unnecessary complexity into > this? Decimal-by-default C notation would break compatibility (undetectably, in the case of hex constants that don't happen to use digits above 9) with current DTS files which are hex-by-default -- and besides, most of the values are going to be hex. I agree that allowing the space to be omitted would be a good thing. -Scott