From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] use winbond libata instead of ide driver for pseries CD drives Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:55:08 +0300 Message-ID: <45D5C5CC.9070406@ru.mvista.com> References: <20070210203512.GA25586@aepfle.de> <20070216092046.GA2572@aepfle.de> <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:51155 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422638AbXBPOzS (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:55:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Olaf Hering , Jeff Garzik , Paul Mackeras , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> I'm sorry, how those 2 drivers can be equivalent?! The pata_winbond driver >>is for VLB only, sl81c105 was for PCI only -- you certainly want to use >>pata_sl82c105 (indeed better version of sl82c105 driver). > I was under the impression that with your fixes these drivers > (sl82c105 and pata_sl82c105) are functionally equivalent. They're not yet equivalent. pata_sl82c105 supports all MWDMA modes, sl82c105 still supports only MWDMA2. WBR, Sergei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18A1DDEA0 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:55:17 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45D5C5CC.9070406@ru.mvista.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:55:08 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] use winbond libata instead of ide driver for pseries CD drives References: <20070210203512.GA25586@aepfle.de> <20070216092046.GA2572@aepfle.de> <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Andrew Morton , Olaf Hering , Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackeras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> I'm sorry, how those 2 drivers can be equivalent?! The pata_winbond driver >>is for VLB only, sl81c105 was for PCI only -- you certainly want to use >>pata_sl82c105 (indeed better version of sl82c105 driver). > I was under the impression that with your fixes these drivers > (sl82c105 and pata_sl82c105) are functionally equivalent. They're not yet equivalent. pata_sl82c105 supports all MWDMA modes, sl82c105 still supports only MWDMA2. WBR, Sergei