From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:31:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mother.pmc-sierra.com ([216.241.224.12]:28598 "HELO mother.pmc-sierra.bc.ca") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S20039048AbXBPQbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:31:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 25663 invoked by uid 101); 16 Feb 2007 16:30:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca) (216.241.226.184) by mother.pmc-sierra.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2007 16:30:35 -0000 Received: from bby1exi01.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca [216.241.231.251]) by pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (8.13.4/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l1GGUYC8029448; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:30:34 -0800 Received: by bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <17WPXC0Y>; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:30:34 -0800 Message-ID: <45D5DC24.7090506@pmc-sierra.com> From: Marc St-Jean To: Andrew Morton Cc: Marc St-Jean , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:30:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) x-originalarrivaltime: 16 Feb 2007 16:30:28.0716 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4F6EAC0:01C751E7] user-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14125 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:26:29 -0600 > Marc St-Jean wrote: > > > + status = *(volatile u32 *)up->port.private_data; > > It distresses me that this patch uses a variable which this patch > doesn't initialise anywhere. It isn't complete. > > The sub-driver code whch sets up this field shuld be included in the > patch, no? > OK, I'll re-post with the platform file which initializes the variable. That file however will reference other files in the platform which has not been posted yet. I thought it was better to post the driver-only code. Marc