Re: [PATCH] Add git-unbundle - unpack objects and references for disconnected transfer

[Mark Levedahl <mdl123@verizon.net>]

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not think your patch (original or respun) checks if it is
> overwriting the current branch.  Even if it is a fast forward,
> it should check this condition and prevent the end user from
> getting confused.  The above sample command line you quoted from
> my message can potentially have the same problem, but "git
> fetch" checks and refuses.
>   
True. I've been using this to mirror remote/* and tags. Making this just 
an alternate transport behind fetch and pull is clearly the cleanest way 
to deal with non-remote branches.
> A final note.  A real 'mirror' mode should also remove stale
> refs that do not exist on the remote side anymore, which is a
> different use case as your bundle, which presumably is primarily
> meant to carry not all but only selected set of refs, and most
> likely not the 'master' branch head (and I am guessing that that
> is why you forgot to make sure you are not overwriting the
> current branch in the unbundle script).  A real 'mirror' mode
> would use a separate option to remove a ref that does not exist
> on the remote end anymore, like:
>
> 	$ git fetch --mirror-all git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
>   
Perhaps "git fetch --mirror --delete" would be more suggestive of the 
difference to "git fetch --mirror"?

Mark