From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerald Grabner <gerald.grabner@gmx.net>
Subject: snd_seq: buffered vs. direct output of events
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:51:49 +0100
Message-ID: <45DCB0E5.8090408@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Hi there,

I'm wondering what the pros and cons of buffered vs. direct output of
sequencer events might be.

As far as I have found out, snd_seq_event_output_direct has the
advantage of not having to care about calling snd_seq_drain_output. On
the other hand, snd_seq_event_output allows the removal of scheduled
events via snd_seq_remove_events.

But I am sure that there are a number of other arguments...

Thx,
Gerald

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV