From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:08:30 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI? Message-Id: <45DEA0FE.7020601@hhs.nl> List-Id: References: <45D5EA88.7090300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D5EA88.7090300@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:13:30 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I'm thinking that it might be an idea to also use this idea of udev autoloading >> through DMI info for the abituguru and abituguru3 driver (review please). The >> both only support about 12 motherboards. For the abituguru driver, dmi info >> could also be used to automatically set the module options needed on the 2 >> oldest uguru featuring abit motherboards. What do you think about this? > > Given that the uguru chips are hard (impossible) to detect and only a > small number of boards need it, yes, I think it's a good idea. > I'm glad you like it, but how does this relate to using dmi info in sensors-detect, if we add that capability to sensors-detect and add a database with known motherboards and there configs, then that would be a doublure with having the info in the drivers, this is the main reason why I hesitate. Regards, Hans