From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: soft lockup detected on AT91RM9200
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:39:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DEC477.2070901@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45DEBF20.2060907@domain.hid>
Steven Scholz wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I am running xenomai (svn 22.02.2007) with adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-arm-1.6-02.patch
> on our AT91RM9200 board. (# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set)
>
> When starting latency with 100µs period I get
>
> ~ # latency
> == Sampling period: 100 us
> == Test mode: periodic user-mode task
> == All results in microseconds
> warming up...
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
> [<c001dce8>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x14) from [<c004ce50>] (softlockup_tick+0x98/0xb8)
> [<c004cdb8>] (softlockup_tick+0x0/0xb8) from [<c0037cf8>] (run_local_timers+0x18/0x1c) r7 = 00000011 r6 = 00000000 r5 = 00000000 r4 = C02F8940
> [<c0037ce0>] (run_local_timers+0x0/0x1c) from [<c0037d40>] (update_process_times+0x44/0x6c)[<c0037cfc>] (update_process_times+0x0/0x6c) from [<c001db4c>] (timer_tick+0xf8/0x120) r5 = C01F9DE0 r4 = C01F0660
> [<c001da54>] (timer_tick+0x0/0x120) from [<c0023a8c>] (at91rm9200_timer_interrupt+0x34/0xf8) r5 = C01F9DE0 r4 = C01F0660
> [<c0023a58>] (at91rm9200_timer_interrupt+0x0/0xf8) from [<c004d320>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x38/0x6c) r5 = 00000000 r4 = C01AD8F0
> [<c004d2e8>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x0/0x6c) from [<c004e5e8>] (handle_level_irq+0x74/0xcc) r7 = 00000011 r6 = C01AF2C0 r5 = 00000011 r4 = C01A8440
> [<c004e574>] (handle_level_irq+0x0/0xcc) from [<c001a6c0>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x48/0x60) r5 = 00000000 r4 = C0213930
> [<c001a678>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x0/0x60) from [<c004f2c0>] (__ipipe_sync_stage+0x208/0x290) r5 = 00000000 r4 = C01AF2C8
> [<c004f0b8>] (__ipipe_sync_stage+0x0/0x290) from [<c004f86c>] (__ipipe_walk_pipeline+0xa4/0xc8)
> [<c004f7c8>] (__ipipe_walk_pipeline+0x0/0xc8) from [<c001f004>] (__ipipe_handle_irq+0x18c/0x19c) r7 = 00000011 r6 = C01FC2C0 r5 = 00000011 r4 = FFFFFFFF
> [<c001ee78>] (__ipipe_handle_irq+0x0/0x19c) from [<c001f140>] (__ipipe_grab_irq+0xbc/0x120)
> [<c001f084>] (__ipipe_grab_irq+0x0/0x120) from [<c00199a4>] (__irq_svc+0x24/0x4c)
> [<c004f578>] (__ipipe_unstall_root+0x0/0x4c) from [<c004f5e4>] (__ipipe_restore_root+0x20/0x24)
> [<c004f5c4>] (__ipipe_restore_root+0x0/0x24) from [<c0045a20>] (hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x6c/0x74)
> [<c00459b4>] (hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x0/0x74) from [<c0045a40>] (hrtimer_cancel+0x18/0x24) r7 = 00000000 r6 = 00000001 r5 = C1D82000 r4 = C1D83F3C
> [<c0045a28>] (hrtimer_cancel+0x0/0x24) from [<c0179b08>] (do_nanosleep+0x50/0x80) r4 = C1D83F3C
> [<c0179ab8>] (do_nanosleep+0x0/0x80) from [<c0045d6c>] (hrtimer_nanosleep+0x4c/0x16c) r6 = 00000001 r5 = C1D83F3C r4 = 00000000
> [<c0045d20>] (hrtimer_nanosleep+0x0/0x16c) from [<c0045f28>] (sys_nanosleep+0x9c/0xb0)[<c0045e8c>] (sys_nanosleep+0x0/0xb0) from [<c0019d84>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x10) r6 = 00000000 r5 = BEAB9D5E r4 = 00000000
>
>
> This text is printed very slowly onto teh serial console. Also the timer leds blinks very slowly.
> I'd say 10 times slower.
>
> Ideas? How can I help with debugging this?
100us is too small, as I already told you here:
https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2007-02/msg00019.html
The latency process spend 100% of its time handling the timer ticks, and
the kernel detects a soft lockup.
The difference between I-pipe patch 1.6-01 and 1.6-02 is that the return
from exception is correctly handled. Maybe it is what allows the kernel
to print a clean message. Maybe it is because you now have enabled the
soft lockup detector whereas you previously did not.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 10:17 [Xenomai-core] soft lockup detected on AT91RM9200 Steven Scholz
2007-02-23 10:39 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2007-02-23 11:17 ` [Xenomai-core] " Steven Scholz
2007-02-23 10:40 ` [Xenomai-core] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DEC477.2070901@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=Xenomai-core@domain.hid \
--cc=steven.scholz@domain.hid \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.