From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45DEF92B.30908@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:24:43 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] latency hangs on AT91RM9200 References: <45DECFAF.60304@domain.hid> <45DEE913.9080809@domain.hid> <45DEF122.2060406@domain.hid> <45DEF605.2060402@domain.hid> <45DEF6AA.5030609@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <45DEF6AA.5030609@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Steven Scholz Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid Steven Scholz wrote: > Gilles, > > >>>Sure but I would still not expect the system to hang! >>>As I said missing a deadline is bad but ok. >>>But hanging the whole system is not quite ok. >> >>I want this bug solved too, especially since I am not sure that we will >>only see it with too short periods. > > > Makes us two! ;-) > > >>I would add the call to printascii(printk_buff) directly in vprintk, and >>use printk. Note however that special care must be taken to avoid >>recursion when calling printk inside schedule, because printk may use >>schedule. Anyway, I think the tracer will give better results than a >>simple backtrace. > > Ok. Thanks. > > So what exactly shell I do? I have never worked with "the tracer". There is an entry in Xenomai wiki about the I-pipe tracer, see: http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/I-pipe:Tracer -- Gilles Chanteperdrix