All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@maine.edu>
To: Colin Simpson <csimpson@csl.co.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:55:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DF46B7.3040707@maine.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172258378.21648.51.camel@cowie>

Colin Simpson wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> We had a small server here that was configured with a RAID 1 mirror,
> using two IDE disks. 
> 
> Last week one of the drives failed in this. So we replaced the drive and
> set the array to rebuild. The "good" disk then found a bad block and the
> mirror failed.
> 
> Now I presume that the "good" disk must have had an underlying bad block
> in either unallocated space or a file I never access. Now as RAID works
> at the block level you only ever see this on an array rebuild when it's
> often catastrophic. Is this a bit of a flaw? 
> 
> I know there is the definite probability of two drives failing within a
> short period of time. But this is a bit different as it's the
> probability of two drives failing but over a much larger time scale if
> one of the flaws is hidden in unallocated space (maybe a dirt particle
> finds it's way onto the surface or something). This would make RAID buy
> you a lot less in reliability, I'd have thought. 
> 
> I seem to remember seeing in the log file for a Dell perc something
> about scavenging for bad blocks. Do hardware RAID systems have a
> mechanism that at times of low activity search the disks for bad blocks
> to help guard against this sort of failure (so a disk error is reported
> early)?
> 
> On Software RAID, I was thinking apart from a three way mirror, which I
> don't think is at present supported. Is there any merit in say, cat'ing
> the whole disk devices to /dev/null every so often to check that the
> whole surface is readable (I presume just reading the raw device won't
> upset thing, don't worry I don't plan on trying it on a production
> system). 
> 
> Any thoughts? As I presume people have thought of this before and I must
> be missing something.

Yes, this is an important thing to keep on top of, both for hardware 
RAID and software RAID.  For md:

	echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action

This should be done regularly. I have cron do it once a week.

Check out: http://neil.brown.name/blog/20050727141521-002

Good luck,

Steve
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
  Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group    Email: cousins@umit.maine.edu
  Marine Sciences, 452 Aubert Hall       http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu
  Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469        Phone: (207) 581-4302



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-23 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-23 19:19 Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness? Colin Simpson
2007-02-23 19:55 ` Steve Cousins [this message]
2007-02-23 20:08   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-02-25 12:24   ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-25 19:15     ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08       ` Mark Hahn
2007-02-25 21:02         ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-26 16:56       ` David Rees
2007-02-26 17:26         ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-26 19:40           ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2007-02-26 21:13           ` David Rees
2007-02-26 21:22             ` Neil Brown
2007-02-27 20:12               ` David Rees
2007-02-26 22:38           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-27  4:10         ` berk walker
2007-02-23 20:25 ` Neil Brown
2007-02-24  4:14   ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08 ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45DF46B7.3040707@maine.edu \
    --to=steve.cousins@maine.edu \
    --cc=csimpson@csl.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.