From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH libata-dev#upstream-fixes] pata_amd: fix an obvious bug in cable detection Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:41:22 +0900 Message-ID: <45E1CA42.6070707@gmail.com> References: <20070205080128.GH1625@htj.dyndns.org> <20070225132945.44299b0c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <45E19AE7.2020206@gmail.com> <200702251839.36205.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.225]:29584 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965031AbXBYRl1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:41:27 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so1111738wxd for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:41:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200702251839.36205.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan , Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Mark Lord , Sergei Shtylyov Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Why can't libata do the right thing and just send IDENTIFY command > to the slave device first? That's my plan B. I'm just not sure whether it would do any good, would it? -- tejun