From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Hambourg Subject: Re: strange behaviour Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:34:56 +0100 Message-ID: <45E2FE20.90701@plouf.fr.eu.org> References: <20070226124547.69013.qmail@web36804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <45E2F479.7020804@plouf.fr.eu.org> <1172502565.4265.118.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1172502565.4265.118.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Cedric Blancher a =E9crit : >=20 > iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -o ppp0 -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu TCPMSS works only on TCP packets with the SYN flag set, so the options=20 "-p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN" are required. Also, wouldn't it be useful to do it in both directions to avoid=20 fragmentation if host (b) does not use path MTU discovery ?