From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMNEV-0001qL-OJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:44:31 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMNEU-0001oF-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:44:31 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMNET-0001nz-Ru
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:44:29 -0500
Received: from mail.nomovok.com ([217.30.189.230])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HMNET-0008Gl-En
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:44:29 -0500
Received: from [85.77.97.162] (GYZMMMCLXI.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.77.97.162])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.nomovok.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA0E1D0010
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:44:21 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <45E56B22.4060203@nomovok.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:44:34 +0200
From: Pablo Virolainen <Pablo.Virolainen@nomovok.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: clfs arm problem
References: <bdb0025f0702270542g5ef518e5h4ba5e44e17bb4de0@mail.gmail.com>
	<bdb0025f0702270936u5acdf56jf7868ed006e3b641@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bdb0025f0702270936u5acdf56jf7868ed006e3b641@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Rodrigo Vivi kirjoitti:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just noticed that qemu does not has the xxxxat() syscalls support
> implemented yet...
>
> Does anyone has a patch that implements these syscalls:
>
> .long sys_openat        /* 295 */
> .long sys_mkdirat
> .long sys_mknodat
> .long sys_fchownat
> .long sys_futimesat
> .long sys_fstatat64     /* 300 */
> .long sys_unlinkat
> .long sys_renameat
> .long sys_linkat
> .long sys_symlinkat
> .long sys_readlinkat        /* 305 */
> .long sys_fchmodat
> .long sys_faccessat
If I'm correct these *at calls was added to Linux in kernel 2.6.16. So 
setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL may help.

Pablo