From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l22BaaDA027664 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:36:36 -0500 Received: from mail2.syneticon.net (mail.syneticon.net [213.239.212.131]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l22BaWSi024594 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:36:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CF554673 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:36:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2.syneticon.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (linux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28685-02 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:36:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net (postfix1.syneticon.net [192.168.112.6]) by mail2.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:36:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (filter1.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C11C946C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net ([192.168.113.4]) by localhost (mx03.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id CjuoVYQe-pQD for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:35:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [81.173.142.58] (xdsl-81-173-142-58.netcologne.de [81.173.142.58]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:36:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45E80C24.5020301@wpkg.org> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:36:04 +0100 From: Tomasz Chmielewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] vgdisplay - checksum error - what does it mean? References: <45D448F5.3000301@wpkg.org> <45D47AF5.2040106@wpkg.org> <20070216074737.GA14119@percy.comedia.it> <45D57D16.8060902@wpkg.org> <20070217125644.GC11919@percy.comedia.it> <20070217183431.GW7201@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <45DD98CC.1020305@wpkg.org> <45DDA0DE.2020105@wpkg.org> <20070225083815.GA23001@percy.comedia.it> In-Reply-To: <20070225083815.GA23001@percy.comedia.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Luca Berra schrieb: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:55:42PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb: >>> Alasdair G Kergon schrieb: >>>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:56:44PM +0100, Luca Berra wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:44:54AM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >>>>>> BTW, the machine is running Debian etch (ARM port). >>>>> mmm i don't have an arm maybe this is the issue why lvm does not >>>>> understand that sda2 is a md component?!? >>>> >>>> I've not followed this thread, but you must use version 2.02.21 or >>>> later >>>> for the ARM architecture with md (or backport the patch). >>> >>> Hmm, I must try that. >>> >>> I'll let the list know in a week or so. >> >> Hmm, I can't compile that: >> >> (...) >> gcc -c -I. -I../include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fPIC -Wall -Wundef -Wshadow >> -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes >> -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wmissing-noreturn >> -O2 striped/striped.c -o striped/striped.o >> report/report.c:67: warning: ?struct dm_report_field? declared inside >> parameter list > Did you update device-mapper as well? > > Anyway the patch to support both endian versions of the md superblock is > very small and can be applied to lvm earlier than 2.02.21 > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/device/dev-md.c.diff?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&cvsroot=lvm2 Curiously, I updated lvm to Debian's 2.02.06-3, rebooted (machine was in a rather weird state), and the issue is gone. With Debian's libdevmapper-dev 1.02.08-1 it doesn't compile; I didn't try to upgrade it anymore. -- Tomasz Chmielewski