From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: "Mathieu Bérard" <Mathieu.Berard@crans.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: Regression between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:00:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45EB79C1.3070107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45EB6980.90600@crans.org>
Hello, Mathieu.
Mathieu Bérard wrote:
> Hello,
> I have and laptop with an ICH6M SATA Controller and an Hitachi hard drive.
> While it worked well using the ahci module and with NCQ enabled using
> Linux 2.6.20, it does not work anymore (hang at boot) with 2.6.21-rc*
>
> My drive is among those that were recently blacklisted (see lkml post
> "[PATCH] libata:
> add NCQ blacklist entries from Silicon Image Windowsdriver)
> (Model Number: HTS541010G9SA00 and Firmware Revision: MBZOC60D)
> This blacklisting patch is in -mm now.
> So there is probably a drive related issue here, I'm just wondering why
> it just work
> flawlessly with a 2.6.20...
>
> Relevant part of kernel log:
> [ 16.044663] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> [ 16.089475] ata1.00: ATA-7: HTS541010G9SA00, MBZOC60D, max UDMA/100
> [ 16.089525] ata1.00: 195371568 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
No, your drive isn't blacklisted yet. NCQ is still being enabled.
> [ 16.091804] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
> [ 18.151756] SCSI device sda: write cache: enabled, read cache:
> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[--snip--]
> [ 18.151856] SCSI device sda: 195371568 512-byte hdwr sectors (100030 MB)
> [ 18.151911] sda: Write Protect is off
> [ 18.151977] SCSI device sda: write cache: enabled, read cache:
> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> [....]
> [ 48.143940] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
> frozen
> [ 48.143999] ata1.00: cmd 60/08:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0
> cdb 0x0 data 4096 in
> [ 48.144000] res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask
> 0x4 (timeout)
It looks like IRQ isn't getting through. Does giving "acpi=off" kernel
parameter make any difference?
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-05 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-05 0:51 Regression between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive Mathieu Bérard
2007-03-05 2:00 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-03-05 21:27 ` Mathieu Bérard
2007-03-14 5:31 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45EB79C1.3070107@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=Mathieu.Berard@crans.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.