From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guillaume Rousse Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] autofs 5.0.1 release Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: <45ED455A.60406@inria.fr> References: <200702200718.l1K7Ixlk029511@raven.themaw.net> <45DC0CEA.5050502@inria.fr> <1172066045.3380.16.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1172066045.3380.16.camel@raven.themaw.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org Ian Kent wrote: > Thanks for the reminder. > I've grabbed them again and I'll have a closer look this weekend. > > One thing though, I feel quite strongly about renaming the config file > but maybe I misunderstand what your trying to do so let me check it out > first. I guess you're refering to autofs-5.0.1-rc1-cleanup-config-files-names.patch here. Reading it now, it seems I mixed two issues: - make ldap_auth configuration file researched in autofs configuration directory, instead of having to set its full name in autofs configuration file, avoiding yet another subtitution during installation - and actually renaming autofs to autofs.conf, mainly for consistency between files I understand such changes ocurring after a final release may be considered a bit drastic, that's why I originally submitted quite long ago. The same applies to the patch renaming configuration options from DEFAULT_FOO to just FOO: while cleaner, it breaks existing configurations. If you don't want to merge them now, please consider them for a 5.1 release then.