All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: resend: KERNEL BUG: nice level should not affect SCHED_RR timeslice
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:43:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ED8C13.5020401@nortel.com> (raw)


Apparently the timeslice of the SCHED_RR process varies with nice level 
the same way that it does for SCHED_OTHER.  So while niceness doesn't 
affect the priority of a SCHED_RR task, it does impact how much cpu it gets.

SUSv3 indicates, "Any processes or threads using SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR 
shall be unaffected by a call to setpriority()."

The code in set_user_nice() has a comment that leads me to believe the 
current behaviour is accidental (although I think the "not" in the last 
line isn't meant to be there):

/*
  * The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still
  * allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected
  * it wont have any effect on scheduling until the task is
  * not SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH:
  */

It appears that the desired behaviour is to allow setting the nice level 
of a realtime task, but to not have it affect anything until (and 
unless) it drops that realtime status.  Is this correct?

Chris

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-06 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-06 15:43 Chris Friesen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-07 23:19 resend: KERNEL BUG: nice level should not affect SCHED_RR timeslice Chris Friesen
2007-03-12  9:27 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 15:18   ` Chris Friesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45ED8C13.5020401@nortel.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.