From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: detecting/correcting _slightly_ flaky disks Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:14:26 -0500 Message-ID: <45EE03E2.5000309@tmr.com> References: <17898.45673.573800.56474@notabene.brown> <45EB3867.8050907@eyal.emu.id.au> <17899.18568.523543.478792@notabene.brown> <45EBCA83.40106@eyal.emu.id.au> <45EC2F89.2070703@pobox.com> <45EC4CFD.3050106@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45EC4CFD.3050106@pobox.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: mjstumpf@pobox.com Cc: Justin Piszcz , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Michael Stumpf wrote: > This is the drive I think is most suspect. What isn't obvious, > because it isn't listed in the self test log, is between #1 and #2 > there was an aborted, hung test. The #4 short test that was aborted > was also a hung test that I eventually, manually aborted--heard > clicking from drives at that time, can't swear it was from this drive > though. > > Not sure I fully understand the nuances of this report. If anything > jumps out at you, I'd appreciate a tip on how you read it. (to me, > looks mostly healthy) > For what it's worth, if you are getting hung tests, either your drive or power supply should be redeployed as a paperweight. My opinion... -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979